Group C
SCO

Scotland

Coach: Steve Clarke
Group rank
3
Points
3
Played
3
Goal diff.
-3
Status
Out
Fixtures
By date
Fixtures / results
Countries
Groups overview
Group C
1BRAQ
PL 32-1-0GF 7-1GD 6PTS 7
2MARQ
PL 32-1-0GF 6-3GD 3PTS 7
3SCOOut
PL 31-0-2GF 1-4GD -3PTS 3
4HAIOut
PL 30-0-3GF 2-8GD -6PTS 0
#TeamPLWDL+/-GDPTSStatus
1Brazil32107-167Qualified
2Morocco32106-337Qualified
3Scotland31021-4-33Out
4Haiti30032-8-60Out
Nation lens
Identity1 / 4
N1 · Identity
balanced · direct

How they play

Scotland operates with a balanced, direct tactical identity defined by high-intensity pressing and a reliance on key individual contributors. With an aggressive 8.7 PPDA, they prioritize disrupting opponents quickly, while Scott McTominay’s significant share of the scoring output highlights their reliance on specific attacking outlets.

Playing identity · system ↔ individual × direct ↔ possession
SystemIndividualPossessionDirectSystem-builtpossessionStar-ledpossessionPress-and-transitionStar-ledcounter-attackersSCO

Scotland is plotted from possession share and top-scorer concentration. PPDA and recent form are supporting context when present.

+Recent form8 · 5W 0D 3L
2026-06-24World Cup 2026HSCO 0-3 BRAL
2026-06-19World Cup 2026HSCO 0-1 MARL
2026-06-14World Cup 2026ASCO 1-0 HAIW
2025-11-18World Cup 2026 qualifying · UEFAHSCO 4-2 DENxG 1.7-2.5W
2025-11-15World Cup 2026 qualifying · UEFAASCO 2-3 GRExG 1.5-2.8L
2025-10-12World Cup 2026 qualifying · UEFAHSCO 2-1 BLRxG 1.1-0.9W
2025-10-09World Cup 2026 qualifying · UEFAHSCO 3-1 GRExG 1.4-1.4W
2025-09-08World Cup 2026 qualifying · UEFAASCO 2-0 BLRxG 2.3-0.7W
International friendly matches are excluded
N2 · Scoring
open play 100%

How they score

Scotland relies exclusively on open play to generate their classified goal output. With 100% of their classified goals originating from open play, the team demonstrates a clear preference for building through active movement rather than set-piece situations. This reliance highlights the importance of their primary attacking threats in creating and finishing chances during active phases of play.

Goal source · share of play-type-classified goals
100%
Open play100%
Effectiveness · conversion by source vs benchmark
Open play18%avg 20%-1 pts
19 goals from 103 shots.
Set piece0.0%avg 4.5%-4 pts
0 goals from 44 shots.
benchmark average higher than field by 3+ pts lower than field by 3+ pts
Goal-source shares use non-own-goal rows with source_class values; own goals are excluded.
+Top scorers · still a threat?100% intact

100% of listed scorer goals come from players still marked in the squad.

Scott McTominayin squad13 · 27%
John McGinnin squad7 · 14%
Lyndon Dykesin squad4 · 8%
Ryan Christiein squad4 · 8%
N3 · Conceding
open play 84%

How they concede

Scotland's defensive structure is most vulnerable to sustained pressure in open play. With 84% of their classified goals conceded during active play, opponents may find success by prioritizing quick transitions and fluid movement to bypass their defensive shape. While their set-piece defense remains relatively stable, the high volume of shots faced in open play suggests a recurring challenge in maintaining defensive organization.

Conceded goal source · share of play-type-classified goals
84%
Open play84%Corner8%Free kick8%
16% set piece concededcorner + free kick
Effectiveness · conceded conversion by source vs benchmark
Open play11%avg 20%-9 pts
21 conceded from 196 shots faced.
Set piece5.8%avg 4.5%+1 pts
4 conceded from 69 shots faced.
benchmark average lower than field by 3+ pts higher than field by 3+ pts
Conceded source shares use non-own-goal rows with source_class values.
N4 · Big moments
falls short · -0.26 GD residual

Better than their rating?

Scotland currently trends slightly below their Elo-based expectations. While the team demonstrates high-ceiling potential with notable upsets against top-tier opponents, their overall goal difference residual of -0.26 suggests a tendency to underperform against the statistical baseline.

Over-performance DNA · beats-its-rating × reliability, the tournament field
Beats rating -><- Falls shortVolatile ^Reliable vHigh-ceilingwildcardVolatileunderachieverReliablyoverdeliversReliablybelow par-1.7-0.90+0.9+1.70.81.41.92.5Beats its Elo rating by (goals/match) ->ESPNORHAICODSCO
SCOTournament field · 48solid line = rating-neutral · dashed = field-median reliability100 Elo ~= -0.37 goals
+Biggest over- & under-performances37 matches
Residual = actual goal difference minus what the Elo gap predicted.
vs UKR · 2022-09-21GD +3 vs exp +0.22+2.78
vs ESP · 2023-03-28GD +2 vs exp -0.44+2.44
vs DEN · 2025-11-18GD +2 vs exp +0.08+1.92
vs GER · 2024-06-14GD -4 vs exp -0.03-3.97
vs IRL · 2022-06-11GD -3 vs exp +0.72-3.72
vs GRE · 2025-03-23GD -3 vs exp +0.24-3.24