Group E
CUW

Curacao

Coach: Dick Advocaat
Group rank
4
Points
1
Played
3
Goal diff.
-8
Status
Out
Fixtures
By date
Fixtures / results
Countries
Groups overview
Group E
1GERQ
PL 32-0-1GF 10-4GD 6PTS 6
2CIVQ
PL 32-0-1GF 4-2GD 2PTS 6
3ECUQ
PL 31-1-1GF 2-2GD 0PTS 4
4CUWOut
PL 30-1-2GF 1-9GD -8PTS 1
#TeamPLWDL+/-GDPTSStatus
1Germany320110-466Qualified
2Côte d'Ivoire32014-226Qualified
3Ecuador31112-204Qualified
4Curacao30121-9-81Out
Nation lens
Identity1 / 4
N1 · Identity
balanced · mixed-tempo

How they play

Curacao maintains a balanced tactical identity with a measured approach to possession. The team relies on a distributed attacking structure, with Gervane Kastaneer contributing 17% of their non-own-goal scoring output. This mixed-tempo style allows them to remain competitive against varied opposition.

Playing identity · system ↔ individual × direct ↔ possession
SystemIndividualPossessionDirectSystem-builtpossessionStar-ledpossessionPress-and-transitionStar-ledcounter-attackersCUW

Curacao is plotted from possession share and top-scorer concentration. PPDA and recent form are supporting context when present.

+Recent form8 · 3W 3D 2L
2026-06-25World Cup 2026HCUW 0-2 CIVL
2026-06-21World Cup 2026ACUW 0-0 ECUD
2026-06-14World Cup 2026ACUW 1-7 GERL
2025-11-19World Cup 2026 qualifying · CONCACAFACUW 0-0 JAMD
2025-11-14World Cup 2026 qualifying · CONCACAFACUW 7-0 BERW
2025-10-14World Cup 2026 qualifying · CAF / World Cup 2026 qualifying · CONCACAFHCUW 1-1 TRID
2025-10-10World Cup 2026 qualifying · CAF / World Cup 2026 qualifying · CONCACAFHCUW 2-0 JAMW
2025-09-10World Cup 2026 qualifying · CONCACAFHCUW 3-2 BERW
International friendly matches are excluded
N2 · Scoring
open play 96%

How they score

Curacao relies almost exclusively on open play to generate their scoring output. With 96% of their classified goals originating from open play, the team demonstrates a clear preference for building attacks through active movement rather than set-piece situations. This reliance is supported by a consistent conversion rate that mirrors the field average.

Goal source · share of play-type-classified goals
96.3%
Open play96.3%Corner3.7%
4% set piececorner + free kick
Effectiveness · conversion by source vs benchmark
Open play19%avg 20%-1 pts
26 goals from 138 shots.
Set piece2.1%avg 4.5%-2 pts
1 goals from 48 shots.
benchmark average higher than field by 3+ pts lower than field by 3+ pts
Goal-source shares use non-own-goal rows with source_class values; own goals are excluded.
+Top scorers · still a threat?79% intact

79% of listed scorer goals come from players still marked in the squad.

Gervane Kastaneerin squad5 · 17%
Juninho Bacunain squad3 · 10%
Kenji Gorréin squad3 · 10%
Rangelo Jangaout3 · 10%
N3 · Conceding
open play 100%

How they concede

Curacao concedes exclusively through open play sequences. With all eight classified goals originating from open play, opponents may find success by prioritizing fluid transitions and quick movement to bypass their defensive structure. Their resilience against set pieces suggests a disciplined organization that forces attackers to earn their chances through active build-up play.

Conceded goal source · share of play-type-classified goals
100%
Open play100%
Effectiveness · conceded conversion by source vs benchmark
Open play9.6%avg 20%-10 pts
8 conceded from 83 shots faced.
Set piece0.0%avg 4.5%-4 pts
0 conceded from 47 shots faced.
benchmark average lower than field by 3+ pts higher than field by 3+ pts
Conceded source shares use non-own-goal rows with source_class values.
N4 · Big moments
falls short · -0.92 GD residual

Better than their rating?

Curacao consistently falls short of their Elo-based performance expectations. With a -0.92 goal difference residual, the team exhibits higher volatility than the field median. Their results suggest a struggle to maintain consistency against the baseline, despite occasional high-scoring outliers.

Over-performance DNA · beats-its-rating × reliability, the tournament field
Beats rating -><- Falls shortVolatile ^Reliable vHigh-ceilingwildcardVolatileunderachieverReliablyoverdeliversReliablybelow par-1.7-0.90+0.9+1.70.81.41.92.5Beats its Elo rating by (goals/match) ->ESPNORHAICODCUW
CUWTournament field · 48solid line = rating-neutral · dashed = field-median reliability100 Elo ~= -0.37 goals
+Biggest over- & under-performances17 matches
Residual = actual goal difference minus what the Elo gap predicted.
vs BER · 2025-11-14GD +7 vs exp +2.72+4.28
vs HAI · 2025-06-10GD +4 vs exp +1.26+2.74
vs JAM · 2025-10-10GD +2 vs exp +1.12+0.88
vs GER · 2026-06-14GD -6 vs exp -0.20-5.80
vs SKN · 2023-06-17GD -1 vs exp +2.60-3.60
vs CIV · 2026-06-25GD -2 vs exp +0.55-2.55